<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wartime Sacrifice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shrinkinthekitchen.com/2010/02/03/wartime-sacrifice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shrinkinthekitchen.com/2010/02/03/wartime-sacrifice/</link>
	<description>Why Talk about Food When There's a War on OR The Gourmet's Guide to Berlin, circa 1941...Scott Haas Analyzes The Bunker Mentality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 21:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Madeline</title>
		<link>http://shrinkinthekitchen.com/2010/02/03/wartime-sacrifice/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shrinkinthekitchen.com/?p=508#comment-113</guid>
		<description>What are you, a senator?

America’s top intelligence official told lawmakers on Tuesday that Al Qaeda and its affiliates had made it a high priority to attempt a large-scale attack on American soil within the next six months.
...
At times, the senators seemed more interested in debating one another than in hearing testimony from witnesses. Midway through the hearing, partisan bickering broke out about whether terrorist suspects ought to be tried in civilian courts and whether the man charged as the Dec. 25 bomber should have been given Miranda rights that could protect him against self-incrimination.

As senators traded barbs, the intelligence officials stared stonily ahead or shuffled their notes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/us/politics/03intel.html?hp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you, a senator?</p>
<p>America’s top intelligence official told lawmakers on Tuesday that Al Qaeda and its affiliates had made it a high priority to attempt a large-scale attack on American soil within the next six months.<br />
&#8230;<br />
At times, the senators seemed more interested in debating one another than in hearing testimony from witnesses. Midway through the hearing, partisan bickering broke out about whether terrorist suspects ought to be tried in civilian courts and whether the man charged as the Dec. 25 bomber should have been given Miranda rights that could protect him against self-incrimination.</p>
<p>As senators traded barbs, the intelligence officials stared stonily ahead or shuffled their notes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/us/politics/03intel.html?hp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/us/politics/03intel.html?hp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
